Ukraina, ASV un Krievija sāk trīspušu miera sarunas Abū Dabijā
Abū Dabijā notika pirmais trīspušu miera sarunu posms ar Ukrainu, ASV un Krieviju pēc deviņu mēnešu pauzes tiešos sarunās. Diskutēja par vairsāk, drošības garantijām, iespējamu militāro gūstīnu apmaiņu un jaunu Eiropas drošības sistēmu, taču strīdi par kontroli Donbasa teritorijā palika neatrisināti.
Galvenais
- Pirmais trīspušu sarunu posms Abū Dabijā nosaucās 10. novembrī un turpinājās 11. novembrī 2026. gadā.
- Ukrainas delegāciju vadīja Rustems Umjerovs, Krievijas delegāciju — Vladimirs Medinskis.
- Sarunās piedalījās ASV pārstāvji Stīvs Vitkoffs un Džareds Kušners, Francijas pārstāvji un NATO ģenerālsekretārs Džefri van Leuvens.
- Pēc deviņu mēnešu pauzes Ukraina un Krievija atsāka tiešās sarunas ar ASV starpniecību.
- Maskova pieprasīja aptuveni 5000 kvadrātkilometru Donetas un Luhanska apgabalu teritorijas.
- Ukraina noraidīja ASV piedāvāto kompromisu, kas bija paredzējis Krievijai kontroli pār visu Donbasu līdz frontes līnijai.
- Zelenskis pavēstīja, ka pārrunās tika apspriests militāro gūstīnu apmaiņas formāts 1000 uz 1000 vai 1500 uz 1500.
Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi
Sarunas atjaunoja ASV starpniecībā notikušās Ukraina–Krievijas tiešās sarunas pēc deviņu mēnešu pauzes. Vienночасно they linked a possible end to the war with security guarantees, European participation and a proposed postwar European security architecture. The unresolved territorial dispute remained the central obstacle: Moscow demanded roughly 5,000 square kilometres, while Kyiv rejected territorial concessions.
Kas notika
Ukraine, the United States and Russia held the first round of trilateral peace negotiations in Abu Dhabi on 10–11 November 2026 after a nine-month interruption in direct talks. The first session, opened by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, lasted about four hours. The parties discussed ending the war and establishing a ceasefire, security guarantees, humanitarian steps such as releasing prisoners, Ukraine’s postwar future and a new European security system. Ukrainian and Russian delegations were led by Rustem Umyarov and Vladimir Medinsky, respectively. Ukraine insisted that any agreements preserve its sovereignty and territorial integrity, its right to decide independently and protection against renewed aggression. It also sought long-term financial support for an army of 800,000 and reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure. Russia sought territorial concessions, while Ukraine rejected a reported US compromise that would have handed Russia control across the Donbas front line while leaving Ukrainian-held cities with Ukraine. Possible prisoner exchanges of 1,000 for 1,000 or 1,500 for 1,500 were also discussed.
Kā to atspoguļo Ukrainas avoti
Ukrainian reporting stresses sovereignty, territorial integrity, rejection of concessions and security guarantees capable of preventing another attack. It also highlights the need for long-term financial support for an army of 800,000 and post-war reconstruction. Assessments remain mixed: Ukrainian officials described the Abu Dhabi talks as constructive and meaningful, while former ambassador Oleg Shamshur questioned whether they brought Ukraine closer to peace.
Kā to atspoguļo starptautiskie avoti
International coverage gives prominent attention to US mediation, possible prisoner exchanges, the proposed European security architecture and cautious optimism that differences between Kyiv and Moscow have narrowed. It also examines the UAE’s role as the venue and the diplomatic positions of the United States and Europe. Russian territorial demands and Moscow’s stated goal of revising Europe-wide security arrangements remain central elements of that coverage.
Kur atspoguļojums atšķiras
Ukrainian officials characterized the talks as constructive and meaningful, whereas Oleg Shamshur called them predictable, said they followed a Russian scenario and argued that they did not bring Ukraine closer to peace. American negotiators reported reduced differences and expressed cautious optimism, while a source in the Russian delegation said it was too early to draw conclusions. Ukrainian sources said territorial concessions had never been discussed, yet other reports said US negotiators had offered a territorial compromise that Ukraine rejected.
Konteksts
The talks followed a nine-month interruption in direct Ukrainian-Russian negotiations and were held under US mediation. European countries, Ukraine, the United States and NATO had reaffirmed support for a postwar European security architecture. Ukraine sought at least ten years of financial support for an 800,000-person army and reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure while opposing the deployment of European forces. European countries were expected to coordinate with Ukraine on a representative or group of representatives for the peace talks.